EMTBrian

Members
 View profile  See their activity

  • Content count

    51

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by EMTBrian

  1. Posted

    Interesting question in my honest opinion. As simple as it may seem or sound of a question, It can actually at the same time be a complicated and tricky one to answer as well. Patients may very well be out of their vehicles, but in my honest opinion here, encourage patient to at least undergo a quick assessment. to legallh cover your you know what in this sue happy society we live amongst today. If they absolutely refuse, just gently advise them, they may feel and think they'e fine just because they are walking, and just encourage them to get evaluated at the hospital. If they refuse quick assessment, and hospital evaluation you've done your duty and job. Just explain as well you need their signature on the Patient Care Report attesting refusal to seek medical attention. Just do as you learned in class, and through the training you've undergone with your respective agency.

  3. Posted

    Very interesting. Though have not been down that way in some time. Actually haven't been down since 2010 when I took the EMT class at that very location when Bob Rizzo taught the class. Great EMT Instructor. Became very good friends as well. Tough, but extremely fair Instructor. Understand he took quite the bum-wrap when they transition from Hudson Valley/Regional EMS or whatever the other subsidiary name was, to Care-1 he for some reason was booted out? Probably too qualified for Care-1 liking? I didn't find it a good location to be honest and truthful. Very poor visibility in exiting and entering the place, plus in the middle of nowhere!

  4. Posted

    Velcro, as I've already stated I'm no longer with Arlington. I left going on three years now. But no never did air my concerns with the commissioners. As it is I felt it would only make matters far worse than they already were. I did however voice my concerns a good number of times to the officer's. And hate to put and say it this way, fell on deaf ears. Almost every volunteer fire organization is either in whole or in part very political, as well as have their cliques and have and play with their favorites. Which this point alone in my honest opinion is why volunteer enrollment and retention efforts have been such a difficult task. It's already been stated by the Chief noted in the BOFC meeting minutes the disappointment in the efforts of Recruitment and Retention personnel that were hired several months prior. Unless and until they make the necessary changes internally from company politics, favoritism and so on, then why bother hire and pay people to do something the officers really need and should take ownership of? This is why I truly feel this grant money is being abused by this district.

    Bnechis likes this

  5. Posted

    Velcro,

    It's simple. I will use myself as an actual situation. When I first joined Arlington Fire District, I was not a certified EMT, nor was I a certified First Responder. When the Interview Committee

    first met with me they promised the world to me, (no exaggeration) that they would train me to start off as a first responder. And after so many months, put me through the EMT class. Well,

    here is how the chips fell. They made a few announcements for a District First Responder Class, which was for Arlington, minimum requirement to go on actual EMS calls. Each time an attempt

    was made to have a class, there was insufficient enrollment and interest. So obviously both classes and opportunities were cancelled. Meanwhile, months are beginning to pass me by, and

    getting discouraged and frustrated. Finally yes was able to sign up for and was approved by the Commissioners to take the EMT Class. Yes I passed first time. Then I ran into another brick

    wall, nobody seemed to want to train. There's your hint or key word as to what am talking about here Velcro, with regard to my comment, " Maybe perhaps this organization has to do a

    better job in clarifying and explaining this when the Volunteer Recruitment Interview committee interviews the applicant. This way applicant isn't wasting his or her time

    and not disappointed down the road. "

  6. Posted

    Departmental policy and procedures are pretty much a totally separate issue from how the agency utilizes the grant money, especially concerning the specific concern you raise above. It's completely unrelated in this case.

    Steve,

    I'm sure it's outlined and clearly states how the grant money can and can't be spent. If this is considered "public information" so as if I wish to inspect the documents, I just may go the extra mile

    and do so. I'm not so sure I agree, which is as to why I question whether or not this district is not following the guidelines here. For 1) Why would they hire Recruitment & Retention Specialists & a Coordinator when actually I feel the line officers should take some ownership of and interest in and mentoring the volunteers. That in my opinion would be far more appropriate than having these specialists that really are doing none other than overseeing and following up on the applicant prior to their acceptance & being voted in, to make sure all the necessary paperwork is in order so they can forward it to the appropriate committee to be presented to the general membership. Secondly, Far as duties as it pertains to "retention?" They are nothing more than an ear to listen as to why member is considering leaving, is a liason between the member and which ever officers he/she speaks with to discuss matters in hopes of coming to a resolution. Again here to, I don't

    understand why their can't be periodic dialogue between the member and line officers. This is why I feel this money is being used inappropriately. Secondly to use it to pay volunteers in

    certain cases? Either the organization is paid or it's not.

  7. Posted

    Bnechis

    Confused now. I reviewed my original post and all subsequent responses I made, as well as others. I can't find where I mentioned or tied this into "Federal Grant?"

    Appreciate, however, your explanation. I'm still not so sure, however, whether its 100 percent "voluntary" tax donations for tax break benefits of the donor. As opposed

    to having some surplus of tax-payer money that perhaps goes into a general fund to help subsidize such grants.

    Steve,

    This district from what am understanding gives preference to take on current certified NYS EMT's whom are already working with Commercial Ambulance services

    here in the Hudson Valley, so it relieves them of having to pay money out to send an eligible member to take the class. Maybe perhaps this organization has to do a

    better job in clarifying and explaining this when the Volunteer Recruitment Interview committee interviews the applicant. This way applicant isn't wasting his or her time

    and not disappointed down the road.

  8. Posted

    Bnechis,

    Hopefully this will narrow down as to specifically which grant am speaking of or referring to. If not, this is all I was able to find. Or that had been released to the public at the time

    it was shared with the media. http://www.dhses.ny.gov/media/documents/releases/Volunteer-Firefighter-Emergency-Services-Personnel-Recruitment-Retention.pdf If it still doesn't

    I'm sorry, this is the best I could do.

  10. Posted

    How about you identify the grant? What entity gave them the grant?

    I know FASNY has a grant for this, but have not heard of a "NYS" grant. "FASNY" is the one. Pardon my not being specific here. I couldn't recall at the top of my head which one it was honestly. But yes this is the one.

    Pardon, correcting myself here. New York State Department of Homeland Security & Emergency Services is the agency of whom department made application to and was awarded the

    grant in the amount of $390,000.00 per letter to agency dated 4/9/2013.

  12. Posted

    Let's not all stray from the topic here. I know what the stipulations are for the district to become reimbursed for those "successful" in the EMT. The problem is the the matter presented in the initial post and how this district is directing the monies. My concern or question here is, is it legal? Does it follow the guidelines for usage? That is the matter at hand here! Thanks for all the input folks!

  15. Posted

    There is a Fire District in the Hudson Valley of which I previously but no longer volunteer with for personal reasons that was awarded the Grant by New York State for the purpose of Recruiting and retaining volunteers. I'm speaking in the person of a "tax-payer" and feel this district may possibly be abusing the funds. The district in question of which city I wish to remain anonymous has used this money to 1) Hire paid recruiter/retention specialists, one whom quit several months ago, and about a month ago hired a Recruitment & Retention Coordinator. 2) Has been dispensing stipends for taking Firefighting Essentials. But for those wishing to take the EMT class are being told they would need to pay out of their pocket up front. When I was with this district the district paid. I had to have the Director of EMS sign and vouch for my eligibility. So long as organization was a PCR reporting agency the state absorbs the tuition, that's my interpretation of it, correct me if am wrong. My argument and question here, why are they only compensating volunteers that take the firefighting essentials, but not the members wishing to becoming NYS EMT's? The other stipend am concerned about of which had been dispensed was for taking the annual required OSHA training. Lastly, my concern is from several months back where I read the Asst Chief of the district would use grant money to absorb costs for advertising for volunteers. Just curious if all this is in alignment with the terms and agreements of the usage of grant money.

  17. Posted

    I think you misunderstood this. Two discussion points: CPR as a requirement for a drivers license **OR** CPR as a requirement for graduation.

    No one mentioned a drivers license requirement for graduation, and that's not what this topic is even about..

    Pardon my misunderstanding and not thoroughly reading entire thread. Appreciate the clarification, I stand corrected!

  19. Posted

    Does the NYS Board Of Education have the power to require CPR in order to graduate high school? To go even deeper, to require it in the 9th grade on?

    I know in some places, it's required to get your drivers license.

    Also, are all teachers and all school personnel in NYS required to have CPR/First Aid?

    Sounds bizarre to me, requirement for graduation obtaining a "Drivers License?" Really? What's wrong with our schools? I believe indeed CPR & First Aid Certification should be a

    prerequisite for graduation from High School, as opposed to learning to drive.

  21. Posted

    Maybe everyone just needs to stop bashing all companies. We all do the same job no matter who we work for. EMStar is a company from pennsylvania who took over care 1 who took over hudson valley paramedics who took over empire state ambulance. All it is a name change for them. Transcare is the 3rd largest comapny out there. AMR being number 1 but again who cares. We still do the same job and that is take care of our communities. And I think that everyone forgets that.

    Laurie, I don't see or believe there is any "bashing" so to speak going on here. If somebody interpreted my post as such, that was certainly not the motive or intention.

  23. Posted

    Stop the madness......... We forget TransCare is already all ove the East Coast. As long as they send the proper resources to calls the I could care less.

    Sending a BLS units to a semi or unresponsive patient is NOT acceptable! So far I have seen no change in service with the exception of the same trucks with a different wrap.

    First off, what is "stop the madness" all about? Long story short, i used to work for Transcare, yes I had issues with the company due to their lack of structure and consistency of training.

    Their method of training was instead of being with a Field Training Officer, was thrown with different crews each day. How is one to learn the business by someone other than someone

    whom is dedicated to training and evaluating new-hires. Secondly, I did not bash or bad mouth the company. Yes indeed, many of their ambulances are in disrepair as was some of their

    equipment.

    Thirdly, Obviously Transcare covers most parts of the Hudson Valley and New York City. EmStar is from Pennsylvania, and is just starting to move further east, obviously if they have

    taken Care1 EMS under their wings. I don't know much else about the company. Other than what I looked at on their website. It would be fair to say however, they cover just as much

    territory as Transcare does.

    On a closing note, I found this reply of yours very interrogating. Why reply the way you did in open forum? If you had an issue, we could had sorted things out back-channel.?

  24. Posted

    And the problem with EMstar is????

    EXDC, I don't think there is any problem with EmStar. I checked out their website, researched the company some. By the looks of it seems this company may soon become a larger

    Commercial Ambulance Company than that of Transcare. Advantages of EmStar, obviously newer buses, while Transcare desperately needs to upgrade their clunkers.

    x4093k likes this