TheNewLadder32

Members
  • Content count

    69
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by TheNewLadder32


  1. On August 5, 2016 at 3:41 PM, WHFD 325 said:

    White Plains F.D received there two new engines. New 66, 70, they look identical to the 2010's. The former engine 66 smeal is now engine 67 . Still has 66 on the side, plate number on rear is 67 now. Not sure if this is permeant switch.

    Former Engine 66 now 67 is a permanent switch it is now fully labeled 67 including plates, I believe former Engine 70 went to 71 making former Engines 67 & 71 spares. The lighting package and body design are different on the new engines but as you said everything else is the same.

    Westfield12 and vodoly like this

  2. 9 minutes ago, SECTMB said:

    Generally the same pump, same tank, same equipment, same engine and transmission to get you to the fire in a slightly less fancy package.  What do they pay for these commercial cab engines vs a custom cab? Probably significant money.  

    Also makes for cheaper maintenance since the dpw uses same

    chassis easier parts to get and less down time depending on problem, as SECTMB said it works.

    ems12 likes this

  3. After just reading the history of the White Plains FD up to 1955 I would say PJM1733 is pretty much on target.

    Station 7 being the last new fire station to be built was most likely just assigned that number to be in chronological order.

    May I ask where you read about the history at ? I would definitely like to check it out myself. Thanks in advance


  4. Commercial chassis in a city where run volume is higher, I wouldn't advocate for commercial and I see your point. I'm speaking more about smaller departments who's call volume is below 1,000. When the vehicle is being used a lot more frequently during the course of a normal day with higher response volume, inspection and training duties and all this often on rougher city streets with more time on the brakes, I think warrants a more expensive custom chassis.

    I definitely get your point I was just stating my opinion on the chassis and how your right that a city shouldnt be running commercial chassis. And it would definitely increase the price on the custom chassis but it would definitely be worth the cost .... But i could be wrong please feel free to correct that.


  5. Here in White Plains we have all Commercial chassis Freightliners they tend to have alot more issues then the few Custom chassis we do have. They are nice trucks and are remarkably cheaper but I personally believe that the custom chassis would be better. Their isnt that much room in the Commercial chassis compared to the custom and granted all departments may not be looking for that its also something nice to just be concious of when specing your rigs. It's also weird when you have your Engine chassis the same as your garbage truck chassis just to save costs on parts when the trucks do go out smart idea but kinda tacky in my opinion.


  6. Im just wondering is it cheaper for them to order the bodies as well because China has been ordering the custom chassis from Pierce (i.e. pumpers and rescues).... So wonder why now they want to mount it on chassis made by FAW also as a side note i thought they didnt like trucks manufactuered their?