SECTMB

Members
  • Content count

    483
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by SECTMB


  1. The Times article made it seem that the City was unprepared as it had to 'scramble' and was burdening their existing EMS workers with extra shifts out of their normal districts.

     

    It might have been more assuring to the public if they had mentioned that a class of 180 FD EMS personnel was getting ready to hit the streets with another to follow shortly.

    Of course that would be predicated on whether the article was intended to alarm the public rather than allay any concerns. 


  2. According to the story, the bankruptcy of Transcare left the City short by 81 tours made up of 200 EMS professionals.  There was money from somewhere paying those 200 EMS professionals.

     

    So, why didn't the City just hire those former Transcare workers and have the money that was funding them redirected to City coffers? There must be some way to waive or sidestep, legally, civil service hiring rules for a declared public health emergency.  If there was a compensation disparity between Transcare and City compensation, the City would have to make up the difference, but given that we are only talking about 200 workers, the difference can't be more than a ripple in a budget the size of NYC's.

     

    It would seem to be a win/win, the workers keep their jobs, the City gets State certified, trained and seasoned EMS professionals and the Public gets to keep the EMS workers familiar with their neighborhoods.

     

    I don't know how many buses are involved with those 81 tours, the Transcare physical assets aren't as readily obtainable as released employees, but I imagine the City must have spares or if they must, buy some stock/demo units from whomever has them to get by.

     

    Where was the crisis management plan? Weren't there rumors of issues about Transcare's long term viability? Was it necessary to overwork existing crews? I have no doubt I am oversimplifying a possible remedy, but I also don't think this needed to be more than a speed bump for an EMS response.

    trauma74 likes this

  3. I also wonder if these cars are similarly equipped as NYS. At a community thing one year they had a K-9 Trooper attending and the vehicle was set up so that if the interior temp reached a certain degree, the door would automatically open so the dog could get out.

     

    Doesn't take long for the temp to get critical in FL w/o AC.

    Westfield12 and ARI1220 like this

  4. I had a conversation with a FL State Trooper at the car wash one day.  It was her day off, but she had to dress in full uniform if she wants to use a commercial car wash. And the car wash doesn't comp or discount for MOS.  Florida Troopers make squat money but their vehicles always shine.  A lot of Sheriffs deputies also have personal use of the their vehicles and can use them for personal use in their civvies, its part of their compensation and fuel, mileage and maintenance are all factored some how.

     

    If you're responsible for the vehicle that you may use on a 100 mph chase, you're probably going to make sure its in good working order.

     

    Do CT Troopers still have use of the their cars?  

     

     


  5. While I do not in any way wish to minimize the loss of life of the innocent victims of another terrorist atrocity, once again the President shows his lack of understanding of the Constitution in his directive to order all flags to be flown at half staff.  A well meaning gesture not grounded in actual law which is very specific as to the persons for whom the flag is to be lowered to half staff.

     

    Over time we have diminished the significance of this honor just as we have the label 'Hero'.

     

    I hope Obama had a nice time at the ballgame today,

     

     

    trauma74, AFS1970, SOUSGT and 2 others like this

  6. 10 hours ago, dwcfireman said:

     

    BAM!  Such a true statement.  I like where your head is.  We don't need fancy stuff to fight fires.  Technology doesn't fight fires.  We do!

     

    Didn't 'technology' give us air packs, foam, thermal imaging cameras, nomex, halon, etc, etc, etc, etc.? We've come a long way from bucket brigades and that's due to technology.  'WE' are only the means of utilizing and deploying the technology.

    AFS1970, dwcfireman, x635 and 3 others like this

  7. 44 minutes ago, sfrd18 said:

    There are currently seven firehouses in the town of Greenwich. Five are combination paid/volunteer (Central, Cos Cob, Byram, Glenville, Sound Beach), one is all volunteer (Round Hill) and one is all paid (North Street). Banksville FD in Westchester County provides some coverage to the northern areas of town. The paid GFD currently operates six engine companies and one truck company. Engine 1, Engine 4, and Engine 8 are staffed by four personnel per shift. Engine 2, Engine 3, and Engine 5 are staffed by two personnel. Ladder 1 is staffed by three. There is also a rescue (Rescue 5) that can be cross-staffed if needed. There are also plans to open another firehouse in northwestern Greenwich, which would be Engine 9. I believe the paid GFD does around 4,000 calls annually. EMS is handled by Greenwich EMS.

     

    Greenwich Firehouses:

     

    Central Firehouse (Fire Headquarters), Amogerone Vol. Fire Co. 1, Vol. Hose & Chemical Co. 2 - 15 Havemeyer Pl., Downtown*

    -Engine 1 (4 personnel)

    -Ladder 1 (3 personnel)

    -Car 3 (Deputy Chief)

    -Special Operations 1 (cross staffed incident command unit)

    -Amogerone Squad 1

    -Vol. Hose & Chemical Squad 11

     

    Cos Cob Vol. Fire Co., Cos Cob Fire Police Patrol - 200 E. Putnam Ave.

    -Engine 2 (2 personnel)

    -Cos Cob Engine 21

    -Cos Cob Tanker 2

    -Cos Cob Squad 2

    -Cos Cob Utility 2

    -Cos Cob Marine 2

    -Cos Cob Fire Police Patrol 1

    -Cos Cob Fire Police Patrol 2

    -Cos Cob Fire Police Patrol Boat

     

    Byram Vol. Fire Co. - Delavan Ave. & Mead Ave.

    -Engine 3 (2 personnel)

    -Byram Engine 31

    -Byram Utility 3

    -Decon. Trailer

     

    Glenville Vol. Fire Co. - 266 Glenville Rd.

    -Engine 4 (4 personnel)

    -Glenville Engine 41

    -Glenville Ladder 4

    -Glenville Squad 4

    -Glenville Utility 4

    -Glenville Marine 4

    -Decon. Trailer

     

    Sound Beach Vol. Fire Co. - 207 Sound Beach Ave.

    -Engine 5 (2 personnel)

    -Rescue 5 (cross-staffed)

    -Sound Beach Engine 51

    -Sound Beach Ladder 5

    -Sound Beach Squad 5

    -Sound Beach Utility 5

    -Sound Beach Dive 5

    -Sound Beach Tac. 5

    -Sound Beach Marine 5

     

    Round Hill Vol. Fire Co. - 166 Old Mill Rd.

    -Round Hill Engine 61

    -Round Hill Engine 62

    -Round Hill Tanker 6

    -Round Hill Squad 6

     

    North Street Firehouse - 669 North St.

    -Engine 8 (4 personnel)

     

    (*) Central Firehouse currently being rebuilt. Engine 1 and the Deputy Chief are being temporarily housed at Horseneck Ln. & Shore Rd. Ladder 1, Special Operations 1, and Squad 11 are currently being housed at the Cos Cob Firehouse. Squad 1 is currently being housed at the Byram Firehouse.

    I believe all the stations mentioned have multiple apparatus. What about Sound Beach? It's in Old Greenwich and I think it is 100% volunteer.  When they mention Old Greenwich are they referring to Sound Beach or another station.  If separate stations, does paid Greenwich respond in as well?

     

    Do the volunteer components of the department respond on every call or are they special called if the incident exceeds the on duty level of paid personnel?

     

     


  8. I have a friend who is a real estate agent who uses one these 'personal' drones to take aerial photos of his properties for sale to use in his sales brochures.

     

    If he can justify the expense, couldn't the County Coordinators each have a drone that could be utilized at events such as mentioned? All the YouTube videos of drones at fires certainly show their benefit for command coordination.

    AFS1970, x635 and EmsFirePolice like this

  9. 3 hours ago, Quickness said:

    Greenwich fire departments are volunteer supplemented with career members.

    Are you sure it's not the other way around.  Paid supplemented by volunteers?  Are those two paid firefighters in house waiting for volunteers that may or may not show up before they respond?  

     

    I don't know enough about their SOP's but most paid departments supplemented by volunteers are expecting those volunteers to either pull shifts in station, respond to the scene or to the station to bring additional apparatus to supplement the first out apparatus manned by the paid personnel.

     

    My earlier post was essentially to say if Greenwich can't or won't afford to put three firefighters on an apparatus, who can?

    Morningjoe, boca1day, sueg and 1 other like this

  10. All you have to do is look within your own departments and see that the number of active members, and I mean real actual active members, is not as many as a couple of years ago, less than a few years ago, even less than a decade ago.  For all the reasons that have been identified within these forums the ranks of volunteers is dwindling.  Certainly the way departments are dispatched affects this.  

     

    How many times can you drop what you are doing to respond to an automatic alarm that turns out to be caused by steam from a shower or dust from construction workers? Or to be cancelled before you even get off the ramp?

     

    And, everything now requires an ambulance.  The public has been over educated to dial 9-1-1 for even the most minor maladies.  It seems nobody gets to the hospital under their own steam these days. 

     

    Eventually it will have to become all paid.  Since I left Westchester I have lived in three Southern counties that provided paid fire/EMS-Paramedic services.  Palm Beach County has some pretty pricey areas like Westchester but the other two were/are not nearly as wealthy as Westchester.  If they all can provide paid fire/EMS to their citizens, so can Westchester.  

     

    And for those who keep bringing up that laws and fire districts and all that prevent changes, well, change the laws for the benefit of the people.  That's what legislatures and legislators are for.

     

     

    bad box, Billy and fdalumnus like this

  11. The video and the still shots don't really give enough information regarding the placement of the truck in relation to the active fire.  Generally speaking I was taught never to take my apparatus off hard

    pavement (specialized vehicles notwithstanding).  

     

    Although they have their outriggers extended, they do not appear to be on anything other than the grass surface.  If they were extending the bucket any further than what appears in the still photo they

    could be risking the stability of their working platform. Did they really need a bucket to effect these evacuations or could ground ladders not have accomplished the same in maybe shorter time.

     

    As always, its a judgement call made in a matter of seconds.  Since rescues were accomplished and the apparatus was not damaged, its a win, this time.

     

    I remember a grass fire I responded to.  Kept my CF Mack on the hard road. Our new mini-pumper came in, left the road to cross the field and promptly sank up to its axles.  You take your chances when you leave the road.

     

     


  12. I struck up a conversation with the pilot of my last flight.  He was ex-military and I assumed so many other pilots were also ex-military.  He told me that while that may have been the case years ago, that only about 8% of the pilots hired today are ex-military.  I had always gotten a certain level of confidence in flying thinking that the pilots had military experience.  

    x635 likes this