Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
DWC295

Volunteer FF can sue homeowner after being injured on call at home

28 posts in this topic



Definitely interesting. In CT we have what's known as the "firemen's rule" (though it also applies to law enforcement, etc) that prohibits public safety personnel from suing for these types of injuries.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Slipped on Ice, who would have thought it might get icy on a driveway in New Hampshire?

Live Free or Die....and if that does not work for you....SUE.

x129K, IzzyEng4 and BFD1054 like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What a loser.... And now there entire department looks bad.

Yea cause water don't freeze while your fighting a fire in the winter time!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Injuries are part of the job, and they will happen. I blew out a knee, but my medical coverage took care of

the resulting bills and therapy. Other than that, I totally got over it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Situational awareness, know your surroundings. Someone should remind this guy that he lives in the northeast and it tends to be cold in february...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Live Free or Die....and if that does not work for you....SUE.

This is the accepted mechanism used in our country to settle disputes when they arise. Of course we could use the mechanism used in some Mideastern countries where you settle your differences with a gun or knife. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the accepted mechanism used in our country to settle disputes when they arise. Of course we could use the mechanism used in some Mideastern countries where you settle your differences with a gun or knife. :)

Slipping on Ice on a fire call is not a dispute.

And I have worked EMS a lot closer to home than the middle east, where they settle things with a knife and gun

x129K and INIT915 like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

According to the brief story, both he and his wife sued. I can only assume she sued for lack of consortium while he recovered from whatever injury he suffered. I wonder what value her suit put on his stud services.

I thought injuries suffered while in performance of official duties were covered by workers compensation.

x129K likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What a loser.... And now there entire department looks bad.

Yea cause water don't freeze while your fighting a fire in the winter time!!

This will make the entire fire service look bad. People wont read the entire story and assume firefighters can sue them, this may prevent people from calling us early.

antiquefirelt and x129K like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a great case of Post hoc ergo propter hoc. How can you fault the homeowner. In this case I am sure they provided a reasonable means of maintaining their property in a safe way. The cause of the fall due to ice could equally be placed on the FD for not maintaing a "safe" working environment for their workers

This is all just total crap and for the court to let this proceed. OMG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I can only hope there is also a reciprocal NH law that allows homeowners to sue the Fire Department for any damage they cause while putting out house fires!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And I have worked EMS a lot closer to home than the middle east, where they settle things with a knife and gun

Using a knife and a gun are not accepted mechanisms to settle disputes in this country regardless where you have worked. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Using a knife and a gun are not accepted mechanisms to settle disputes in this country regardless where you have worked. :)

While I agree with you, there are lots of people in Jail, the ER's or the ME's office, that clearly do not.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

While I agree with you, there are lots of people in Jail, the ER's or the ME's office, that clearly do not.

Likewise I agree. That is why most of them who do not agree are guests of the government at this time.

Bnechis likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just wondering what logic if any went into this ruling. The firefighter puts water on the driveway, the water freezes, the firefighter falls and the homeowner is liable. I am missing something here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just wondering what logic if any went into this ruling. The firefighter puts water on the driveway, the water freezes, the firefighter falls and the homeowner is liable. I am missing something here.

I think probably to have a full understanding of the issue at hand, one would need to have a copy of the court transcripts to fully see what the circumstances were as provided by both sides in the matter. Otherwise its most likely speculation on our part; tho' i admit that it would be interesting to see the rationale on why this was filed in the first place.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Injuries are part of the job, and they will happen. I blew out a knee, but my medical coverage took care of

the resulting bills and therapy. Other than that, I totally got over it.

OK...but what if you can't work? What if your sick time is less then your normal paycheck or you had 2 jobs to survive? Then what? I was recently injured and if I had the same injury as a volunteer...I'd have been screwed. I think it is appropriate to have the ability to go after people for certain things if it caused an injury and you wouldn't be covered under normal disability (or plain workers comp for volunteers).

I love how so many put down people that sue....I used to until I was in a situation that I had no other choice but to do so to secure my rights and counter the other sides attempts to thwart those.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OK...but what if you can't work? What if your sick time is less then your normal paycheck or you had 2 jobs to survive? Then what? I was recently injured and if I had the same injury as a volunteer...I'd have been screwed. I think it is appropriate to have the ability to go after people for certain things if it caused an injury and you wouldn't be covered under normal disability (or plain workers comp for volunteers).

I love how so many put down people that sue....I used to until I was in a situation that I had no other choice but to do so to secure my rights and counter the other sides attempts to thwart those.

post-957-0-48987900-1330291889.jpgpost-957-0-88373400-1330291889.jpg :D

Edited by PEMO3
Bnechis, INIT915 and FF398 like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is an unusual case plus there is too little information in this news blurb for us to determine the validity of the lawsuit.

If water the fire department dispensed subsequently froze and formed a layer of ice, then clearly the homeowner is blameless.

If there was a sheet of ice pre-existing on the ground then there might be cause for a claim, in either case we don't know very much of the relevant facts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This decision is simply about the right to file the claim. He may ultimately lose the case. This was just about the lower courts decision to toss the case based upon state law.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If the homeowner didn't have insurance thur suit would never have been filed.

It's the I am not suing you but your insurance company.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Injuries are part of the job, and they will happen. I blew out a knee, but my medical coverage took care of

the resulting bills and therapy. Other than that, I totally got over it.

Wait a second, you were injured as an EMS worker and had to use personal medical coverage to get treatment? How come the agency didn't do it as a line of duty injury and put it through workers compensation, their insurance or municipal coverage (depending on your work environment)?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

just because you can sue, doesn't mean you should.

As usual...simply very well put Bobby.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OK...but what if you can't work? What if your sick time is less then your normal paycheck or you had 2 jobs to survive? Then what? I was recently injured and if I had the same injury as a volunteer...I'd have been screwed. I think it is appropriate to have the ability to go after people for certain things if it caused an injury and you wouldn't be covered under normal disability (or plain workers comp for volunteers).

I love how so many put down people that sue....I used to until I was in a situation that I had no other choice but to do so to secure my rights and counter the other sides attempts to thwart those.

I agree for "certain things". I guess we can all have an opinion on what those things are, but I have to say I beleive the scenario this thread references is a bit of a stretch. But I guess thats for the court to decide.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.